by Commodore on January 12, 2011
Exactly!
It’s almost been enough time to forget about the out-of-touch inanity of the Bush years. But every time you try to put the philosophical foundation of a presidency that were based on the arguments of Puritan 3rd graders, something like this rises up again.
David Frum (George’s Bush’s speech writer) says, “After horrific shootings, we hear calls for stricter regulation of guns. The Tucson shooting should remind us why we regulate marijuana. Jared Lee Loughner, the man held as the Tucson shooter, has been described by those who know as a “pot smoking loner.” He had two encounters with the law, one for possession of drug paraphanalia.
Really, David? A man unloads on a crowd of people with a semi-automatic gun that, thanks to our gun control laws, he probably got in a Cracker Jack box and yet you turn to marijuana for the blame? Marijuana didn’t have a comment because Marijuana was sunk into his couch, eating Cheetos and watching the Cartoon Network in comedic bliss.
David Frum is just another reminder with how out of touch the Bush administration is with reality. This guy wrote speeches for the President of the United States.
No Comments
by Commodore on October 17, 2010
Handy
While walking through the supermarket, I came across this publication in the magazine aisle. I understand the niche market and the long tail of business but let’s be serious, who on earth is running to the store to buy this?
Honey, can you run to the store and pick up some milk and tomatoes? Oh, and can you snag the latest Small Arms Review? I need to see what I can do with these extra 50 cal bullets.
If we’re ever wondering where the milita are hiding, just research who has a subscription to this magazine. Is that guy firing an anti-aircraft gun attached to what looks like a Civil War cannon case? Secondly, I can’t even tell you what any of the statements on the cover mean. Nordenfelt? Sig Sauer? Sandy Shoot? Draco? WTF is going on here?
No Comments
by Commodore on November 9, 2009

This is an actual ad from a Kentrucky newpaper. In case you are blind and/or can’t read, it says: “God, Guns, Guts and REAL GOOD Haircuts!!” What on earth do God, guns and guts have to do with a trim? If the question, “God, Guns, Guts and real good ” was in the category “Things you get at the hairdresser” on Jeopardy, no one would get it.
And you wonder why no one goes to Kentucky? Thankfully, they ship bourbon out of the state otherwise I would just say “Eff It” and learn to like vodka on the rocks. I love that 2nd and 3rd place wins a permit. No assault rifle for you but you can legally fire at shit now.
Even the map that they have seems so detached from reality. Couldn’t get that google map image in there, could you? I guess when you are catering to those people who shop for haircuts and AK47’s at the same time, authentic map diagrams aren’t at the top of your “to-do” list.
No Comments
by Big Lou Al Timber on June 22, 2009
Got this new piece at Walmart son!
Tell me this sentence doesn’t make you feel a little uneasy:
“When people on the government’s terrorist watch list have tried to buy guns or explosives in recent years, the government has let them the vast majority of the time.”
What the fuck? Can somebody please enlighten me as to why a “potential terrorist” would be allowed to buy firearms in our own country? Call me naive, but I fail to see the intelligence behind that.
“”Under current law, there is no basis to automatically prohibit a person from possessing firearms or explosives because they appear on the terrorist watch list,” wrote the GAO’s director of homeland security and justice issues, Eileen R.”
I’m sorry…what? Eileen R, say that sentence to me again and this time look me in the eyes and keep a straight face. Try it, I dare you. “No basis to automatically prohibit a person from possessing firearms or explosives because they appear on the terrorist watch list.”
Fucking what? NO BASIS!?! THIS has no basis, remember that kid? That 8 year old boy wasn’t allowed to board a flight, yet he doesn’t know the meaning of ‘terrorist’. THAT Eileen doesn’t have an ounce of basis.
No Comments