Britain

You don't want twins, that bad, do you?

Try, try again.

At least that is what one woman thinks is a good idea.  Not a problem for the rest of humanity if you’re just trying to figure out how to tie your shoes, but when you’re popping babies out, it is our collective problem.

Sara Foss, a mom-of-13 who costs taxpayers £50,000 a year has said she won’t stop having kids until she gives birth to twins.

Yup.  In 100 years, assuming that each of her kids and grandkids, etc has 2 children each, Sarah Foss’s genetic legacy of 450 great-great-great grandkids will dwarf yours.  Yay!

The brazen mom said today: “All I’ve ever wanted is twins or triplets. It’s my biggest wish, and I’m going to keep trying until I do it.  It would be fantastic. In fact, I won’t stop trying until I’ve done it. I love having babies – it’s the most wonderful thing in the world.”

If you had 13 boys but wanted a girl I could pseudo-see the argument of trying.  But having twins is a 1:33 chance. Why don’t you wish for rain, or snow, instead?  Why don’t you pick up a set of dice and try to roll doubles.  They’re just like twins!  And they dont affect everyone else.  You can write down how many times it takes you to get doubles and then share it with us.  Because if your little twin game is a burden on the state, you’re lucky the British government doesn’t hand you a six-shooter with one bullet in it saying, “Hold the gun to your head.  Keep pulling the trigger until you hear a bang.”

If you think I’m being mean, you would buy the gun yourself after reading this:

Her mammoth brood now comprises Patrick, 23, Stephen, 13, Malachai, 12, Peppermint, 11, Echo, 10, Eli, nine, Rogue, eight, Frodo, seven, Morpheus, five, Artemis, four, Blackbird, three, Baudelaire, two, and nine-month-old Voorhees.

*blink…blink.

Powered by Bookmarkify™