That’s Nit Picky

by Commodore on May 13, 2010

I don't think they will be insulted

Do you ever talk with someone who gets so lost in the details of things that they forget to look at the bigger picture?  Like when you ask a girl to do anal and she’s all worried about pain/discomfort and not the bigger picture of the sexual enjoyment between two people.  This is kind of like that…well, the nit picky part.

Andrew Dymond was charged with possessing “an extreme pornographic image which portrayed in an explicit and realistic way a person performing an act of intercourse with a dead animal, namely a squid, which was grossly offensive, disgusting or of obscene character”.  Prosecutors amended the charge when it was admitted it could have been an octopus in the picture.

If it pleases the court, are we really going to worry about which dead member of the Mollusca phylum this guy was fucking?  Is that going to sway your decision one way or the other?  If some guy stabbed 10 people with a knife, is it going to matter to the court if it was a Ginsu?  WTF.  And I love this part:

The magistrates court in Swansea, southern Wales, heard the sea creature was clearly dead when the man was pictured having sexual intercourse with it.

Yeah I “heard some shit too”.  I didn’t know rumors were now admissible in court.

Last 5 posts by Commodore

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

No Comments

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: