An Eye For An Eye

by Commodore on October 2, 2009

I imagine the boss was this angry

I imagine the boss was this angry

In ethics and law, “Let the punishment fit the crime” is the principle that the severity of penalty for a misdeed or wrongdoing should be reasonable and proportional to the severity of the infraction.  That seems like a pretty fair way to conduct business, but it doesn’t always happen as such. 

For instance, when Michael Vick funds a community dog playing center without authorization, he gets 2 years in jail.  Donte Stallworth was legally drunk and killed a man with his car and he had to stand in the corner for 2 minutes. But this…this is unprecidented.

A fuming boss allegedly SHOT one of his employees after he discovered they had used his private loo.  Police said the raging manager pulled out his gun and blasted the unlucky worker in the leg after hearing of his cheeky toilet trip.

This seems like a “When Keeping It Real Goes Wrong” Chappelle skit!  I’ve heard of shooting someone for eating your cereal but NOT for using your bathroom.  I mean, we are not Visigoths! 

The police always have to make some sort of statement when there is a crime and at the risk of never saying too much before an investigation, we get:

Cops said: “It seems he underestimated the strength of his employer’s feelings on the matter of which toilet he should use.”

It does seem so, indeed, officer.

Last 5 posts by Commodore

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

No Comments

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: